Telerreumatología en tiempos de crisis durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Tele-Rheumatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introducción: Durante la pandemia por COVID-19 las necesidades de prevención de transmisión de la infección viral nos obligaron a potenciar las consultas virtuales. Objetivo: El objetivo de estudio es describir los resultados obtenidos con la anterior estrategia y definir el perfil de paciente más idóneo para aplicarla. Material y métodos: Durante el período comprendido entre el 16 de marzo y y el 10 de mayo del 2020 todas las consultas sucesivas de nuestro servicio fueron realizadas en formato de teleconsulta reumatológica (TCR). Se recogieron las características sociodemográficas, geofuncionales y clínicas de los pacientes; se evalúo mediante escala numérica verbal (0-10, donde 0 = muy insatisfecho hasta 10 = completamente satisfecho) el grado de satisfacción del paciente/médico con la TC. Resultados: La mayoría de los pacientes atendidos en las 469 TCR realizadas fueron mujeres, con una edad media de 60,83 años. Solo el 16% había realizado estudios universitarios. La distancia media recorrida para acudir a una consulta presencial era de 33km, con una inversión de tiempo total promedio de 2 h. La mayoría de los sujetos estaban diagnosticados de artrosis/reumatismos de partes blandas u osteoporosis; el 21% eran presentaban artritis reumatoide. La duración media de la TCR fue de 9,64 min. Encontramos una mayor satisfacción con la TCR por parte del paciente, cuando el nivel de estudios era más alto (OR = 4,33) y por parte del médico cuando el individuo manejaba mejor Internet (OR = 3,22). Conclusión: Es posible transferir actividad asistencial reumatológica hacia la TCR con un grado importante de satisfacción para el paciente y el médico.(AU)

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic strategies to prevent transmission of the viral infection obliged our hospital to promote virtual consultations. Objetive: The objective of this study is to describe the results obtained with the previous strategy of transferring activity to teleconsultation during the period of maximum impact of the pandemic. Material and methods: Between 16/03 and 10/05/2020 all successive consultations in our unit were performed in virtual rheumatology teleconference (RTC) format. The socio-demographic, geo-functional and clinical characteristics of all patients were collected; a numeric verbal scale (NVS) (where 0=very dissatisfied to 10=fully satisfied) was applied to assess the degree of satisfaction of the doctor/patient with the RTC. Results: 469 TC were included. Most patients seen by RTC were women, mean age: 60,83 years. Only 16% had university education. The mean distance travelled for face-to face consultation is 33 Km with a mean total time of 2hours. Most individuals were diagnosed with osteoarthritis/soft tissue rheumatic diseases and/or osteoporosis; 21% had rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of the TC was 9.64minutes. We find more patient satisfaction with the TC when their level of education is higher (OR=4.12); doctor satisfaction was higher when the individual was better able to manage the Internet (OR=3.01). Conclusion: It is possible to transfer rheumatological care activity to TC with a considerable degree of satisfaction for both the patient and the doctor.(AU)

Tele-Rheumatology during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: During the Covid-19 pandemic strategies to prevent transmission of the viral infection obliged our hospital to promote virtual consultations. OBJETIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the results obtained with the previous strategy of transferring activity to teleconsultation during the period of maximum impact of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 16/03 and 10/05/2020 all successive consultations in our unit were performed in virtual rheumatology teleconference (RTC) format. The socio-demographic, geo-functional and clinical characteristics of all patients were collected; a numeric verbal scale (NVS) (where 0 = very dissatisfied to 10 = fully satisfied) was applied to assess the degree of satisfaction of the doctor/patient with the RTC. RESULTS: 469 TC were included. Most patients seen by RTC were women, mean age: 60,83 years. Only 16% had university education. The mean distance travelled for face-to face consultation is 33 Km with a mean total time of 2 h. Most individuals were diagnosed with osteoarthritis/soft tissue rheumatic diseases and/or osteoporosis; 21% had rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of the TC was 9.64 min. We find more patient satisfaction with the TC when their level of education is higher (OR = 4.12); doctor satisfaction was higher when the individual was better able to manage the Internet (OR = 3.01). CONCLUSION: It is possible to transfer rheumatological care activity to TC with a considerable degree of satisfaction for both the patient and the doctor.

Evaluación del dolor en consultas de reumatología españolas: Estudio EVADOR / Pain assessment in Spanish rheumatology outpatient clinics: EVADOR Study

Introducción: Las enfermedades reumáticas son la causa más frecuente de dolor crónico no maligno. En los últimos años el dolor y su manejo han cobrado mayor relevancia en reumatología. Objetivos: Establecer la prevalencia y las características del dolor asociado a enfermedad reumática atendido en consultas de reumatología de nuestro país, así como de su tratamiento y la respuesta a este. Métodos: Estudio multicéntrico observacional con 2 fases, una transversal y otra prospectiva. Se recogieron variables del médico, paciente, dolor y su manejo, comorbilidades, respuesta terapéutica y aspectos psicosociales relacionados. Se analizaron las diferencias entre pacientes nuevos y en revisión (PR). Resultados: Se incluyeron 34 centros y 1.084 pacientes, 32% pacientes nuevos y 68% PR. En general, el dolor estaba presente en el 86% de los pacientes, era crónico en el 81% y neuropático en un 12%. El 50% de los pacientes consideraría el dolor aceptable cuando la intensidad en la escala visual numérica fuese≤2. Entre los PR existía mayor percepción de dolor controlado (65,5% vs. 49,4%) y satisfacción con el tratamiento (53,3% vs. 35,6%). El 23,5% estaba en tratamiento con opioides en el mes previo. Conclusiones: En la última década la prevalencia de dolor en el ámbito reumatológico en nuestro país persiste elevada, aunque ha disminuido. El empleo de opioides, por otra parte, ha aumentado.(AU)

Introduction: rheumatic diseases are the most frequent cause of non-malignant chronic pain. In recent years, pain and its management have become more important in rheumatology. Objectives: to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of pain associated with rheumatic pathology treated in rheumatology clinics in Spain, as well as their treatment and response to it. Methods: Multicentre observational study with two phases (cross-sectional and prospective). Variables were collected from the doctor, patient, pain and its management, comorbidities, therapeutic response and related psychosocial aspects. The differences between de novo (NP) vs follow-up (FP) patients were analyzed. Results: 34 centres and 1084 patients were included, 32% NP and 68% FP. Pain was present in 86%, was chronic in 81% and neuropathic in 12% of the surveyed population. Fifty percent of the patients would regard their pain as tolerable if its intensity according to the visual numeric scale (VNS) was≤2. Among the FP it was more frequent to have the perception of controlled pain (65.5% vs 49.4%) and to be satisfied with the treatment (53.3% vs. 35.6%). Of these patients, 23.5% had been treated with opioids in the previous month. Conclusions: In the last decade, the prevalence of pain in rheumatology in Spain remains high, although it has diminished. The use of opioids, on the other hand, has increased.(AU)

Pain assessment in Spanish rheumatology outpatient clinics: EVADOR Study. / Evaluación del dolor en consultas de reumatología españolas: Estudio EVADOR.

INTRODUCTION: rheumatic diseases are the most frequent cause of non-malignant chronic pain. In recent years, pain and its management have become more important in rheumatology. OBJECTIVES: to estimate the prevalence and characteristics of pain associated with rheumatic pathology treated in rheumatology clinics in Spain, as well as their treatment and response to it. METHODS: Multicentre observational study with two phases (cross-sectional and prospective). Variables were collected from the doctor, patient, pain and its management, comorbidities, therapeutic response and related psychosocial aspects. The differences between de novo (NP) vs follow-up (FP) patients were analyzed. RESULTS: 34 centres and 1084 patients were included, 32% NP and 68% FP. Pain was present in 86%, was chronic in 81% and neuropathic in 12% of the surveyed population. Fifty percent of the patients would regard their pain as tolerable if its intensity according to the visual numeric scale (VNS) was≤2. Among the FP it was more frequent to have the perception of controlled pain (65.5% vs 49.4%) and to be satisfied with the treatment (53.3% vs. 35.6%). Of these patients, 23.5% had been treated with opioids in the previous month. CONCLUSIONS: In the last decade, the prevalence of pain in rheumatology in Spain remains high, although it has diminished. The use of opioids, on the other hand, has increased.

Tele-Rheumatology During the COVID-19 Pandemic. / Telerreumatología en tiempos de crisis durante la pandemia por COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic strategies to prevent transmission of the viral infection obliged our hospital to promote virtual consultations. OBJETIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the results obtained with the previous strategy of transferring activity to teleconsultation during the period of maximum impact of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 16/03 and 10/05/2020 all successive consultations in our unit were performed in virtual rheumatology teleconference (RTC) format. The socio-demographic, geo-functional and clinical characteristics of all patients were collected; a numeric verbal scale (NVS) (where 0=very dissatisfied to 10=fully satisfied) was applied to assess the degree of satisfaction of the doctor/patient with the RTC. RESULTS: 469 TC were included. Most patients seen by RTC were women, mean age: 60,83 years. Only 16% had university education. The mean distance travelled for face-to face consultation is 33 Km with a mean total time of 2hours. Most individuals were diagnosed with osteoarthritis/soft tissue rheumatic diseases and/or osteoporosis; 21% had rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of the TC was 9.64minutes. We find more patient satisfaction with the TC when their level of education is higher (OR=4.12); doctor satisfaction was higher when the individual was better able to manage the Internet (OR=3.01). CONCLUSION: It is possible to transfer rheumatological care activity to TC with a considerable degree of satisfaction for both the patient and the doctor.

Estreñimiento inducido por opioides: la otra epidemia / Opioid-induced constipation: the other epidemic

No disponible

Telerreumatología en tiempos de crisis durante la pandemia por COVID-19 / Tele-rheumatology during the COVID-19 pandemic

INTRODUCCIÓN: Durante la pandemia por COVID-19 las necesidades de prevención de transmisión de la infección viral nos obligaron a potenciar las consultas virtuales. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de estudio es describir los resultados obtenidos con la anterior estrategia y definir el perfil de paciente más idóneo para aplicarla. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Durante el período comprendido entre el 16 de marzo y y el 10 de mayo del 2020 todas las consultas sucesivas de nuestro servicio fueron realizadas en formato de teleconsulta reumatológica (TCR). Se recogieron las características sociodemográficas, geofuncionales y clínicas de los pacientes; se evalúo mediante escala numérica verbal (0-10, donde 0 = muy insatisfecho hasta 10 = completamente satisfecho) el grado de satisfacción del paciente/médico con la TC. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los pacientes atendidos en las 469 TCR realizadas fueron mujeres, con una edad media de 60,83 años. Solo el 16% había realizado estudios universitarios. La distancia media recorrida para acudir a una consulta presencial era de 33km, con una inversión de tiempo total promedio de 2 h. La mayoría de los sujetos estaban diagnosticados de artrosis/reumatismos de partes blandas u osteoporosis; el 21% eran presentaban artritis reumatoide. La duración media de la TCR fue de 9,64 min. Encontramos una mayor satisfacción con la TCR por parte del paciente, cuando el nivel de estudios era más alto (OR = 4,33) y por parte del médico cuando el individuo manejaba mejor Internet (OR = 3,22). CONCLUSIÓN: Es posible transferir actividad asistencial reumatológica hacia la TCR con un grado importante de satisfacción para el paciente y el médico

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic strategies to prevent transmission of the viral infection obliged our hospital to promote virtual consultations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the results obtained with the previous strategy of transferring activity to teleconsultation during the period of maximum impact of the pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 16/03 and 10/05/2020 all successive consultations in our unit were performed in virtual rheumatology teleconference (RTC) format. The socio-demographic, geo-functional and clinical characteristics of all patients were collected; a numeric verbal scale (NVS) (where 0=very dissatisfied to 10=fully satisfied) was applied to assess the degree of satisfaction of the doctor/patient with the RTC. RESULTS: 469 TC were included. Most patients seen by RTC were women, mean age: 60,83 years. Only 16% had university education. The mean distance travelled for face-to face consultation is 33 Km with a mean total time of 2hours. Most individuals were diagnosed with osteoarthritis/soft tissue rheumatic diseases and/or osteoporosis; 21% had rheumatoid arthritis. The mean length of the TC was 9.64minutes. We find more patient satisfaction with the TC when their level of education is higher (OR=4.12); doctor satisfaction was higher when the individual was better able to manage the Internet (OR=3.01). CONCLUSION: It is possible to transfer rheumatological care activity to TC with a considerable degree of satisfaction for both the patient and the doctor

Gabapentinoides: seguridad y uso en el punto de mira / Gabapentinoids: safety and use in the spotlight

No disponible

Estándares de calidad asistencial en reumatología / Asistance quality standards in rheumatology

Objetivo: Elaborar estándares de calidad asistencial y de tiempos de los procesos reumatológicos. Material y m todos: Tras una revisión sistemática de la literatura un grupo de trabajo, constituido por 10 reumatólogos y 2 metodólogos, ha seleccionado 164 indicadores de calidad y de tiempos de proceso. Un panel de 65 expertos los ha puntuado mediante metodología Delphi. Resultados: Entre los 164 estándares obtenidos destacan: número máximo de habitantes por reumatólogo (40.000- 50.000); número mínimo de reumatólogos en una unidad de reumatología (3); tiempo de duración de la primera consulta (30 min) y la sucesiva (19 min), relación sucesiva/primera consulta (3,2); un reumatólogo no debe atender más de 5 primeras visitas/día y no más de 11 consultas sucesivas/día, no debe pasar consulta más de 5 h/día, ni más de 4 días/semana; el tiempo máximo de espera para la primera consulta no será superior a 4 semanas; el tiempo necesario para la visita de pacientes ingresados (43 min al ingreso, 17 min la visita diaria y 40 min el alta); tiempo para la realización de las técnicas más frecuentes en reumatología (12 min para artrocentesis e infiltraciones y 17 min para análisis del líquido sinovial). Conclusiones: Este estudio fija estándares básicos de calidad, organización y tiempo, y es un instrumento útil para la organización de una unidad de reumatología, ya que facilita el diálogo con los gestores sanitarios y contribuye a mejorar la calidad de la práctica reumatológica (AU)

Objective: To developed standards for quality of care and processing times in rheumatology. Materials and methods: After a systematic review of the literature, a working group of 10 rheumatologists and 2 methodologists selected 164 indicators of quality of care and processing times. A panel of 65 experts rated the indicators following a Delphi methodology. Results: Among the most important of the 164 standards obtained were: maximum number of inhabitants per rheumatologist (40,000-50,000); minimum number of rheumatologists in a Rheumatology Unit (3); duration of the first visit (30 minutes) and successive visits (19 minutes), ratio of successive/first visits (3.2); a rheumatologist should receive no more than 5 first visits/day and no more than 11 successive visits/day, and should spend no more than 5 hours on patients visits/day nor more than 4 days/week; the maximum waiting time for first visits should not exceed 4 weeks; the time needed to visit hospitalised patients (43 minutes on admission, 17 minutes for daily visit and 40 minutes at discharge); and time to carry out some of the most frequent procedures in rheumatology (12 minutes for arthrocentesis and infiltrations and 17 minutes for synovial fluid analysis). Conclusions: This study establishes basic standards for quality of care, organisation and process times. It is a useful tool for organizing a Rheumatology Unit which can facilitate dialogue with health administrators and help improve the quality of rheumatology care (AU)

[Asistance quality standards in rheumatology]. / Estándares de calidad asistencial en reumatología.

OBJECTIVE: To developed standards for quality of care and processing times in rheumatology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a systematic review of the literature, a working group of 10 rheumatologists and 2 methodologists selected 164 indicators of quality of care and processing times. A panel of 65 experts rated the indicators following a Delphi methodology. RESULTS: Among the most important of the 164 standards obtained were: maximum number of inhabitants per rheumatologist (40,000-50,000); minimum number of rheumatologists in a Rheumatology Unit (3); duration of the first visit (30 minutes) and successive visits (19 minutes), ratio of successive/first visits (3.2); a rheumatologist should receive no more than 5 first visits/day and no more than 11 successive visits/day, and should spend no more than 5 hours on patients visits/day nor more than 4 days/week; the maximum waiting time for first visits should not exceed 4 weeks; the time needed to visit hospitalised patients (43 minutes on admission, 17 minutes for daily visit and 40 minutes at discharge); and time to carry out some of the most frequent procedures in rheumatology (12 minutes for arthrocentesis and infiltrations and 17 minutes for synovial fluid analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes basic standards for quality of care, organisation and process times. It is a useful tool for organizing a Rheumatology Unit which can facilitate dialogue with health administrators and help improve the quality of rheumatology care.

Mujer de 66 años con dolor en el hombro / A woman with a painful shoulder

No disponible